Talking about the EEOC and the businesses they go after has become a regular occurrence on What The Hell Just Happened?! This episode is no exception. There are several ways sexual harassment can show up within your workplace, and Monroe Auto had to learn this lesson the hard way by paying out a large settlement. Listen to Paul Edwards as he sits down with CeCe Wilson and Amanda Rishor to discuss what happened, and how it could have been stopped before it even started.
Voice Over: Youāre about to listen to another episode of What The Hell Just Happened?! Join Paul Edwards and his guests as they discuss and sometimes even solve some interesting HR problems.
Paul: I walked up on stage one time and my zipper was down.
Amanda: Oh my god.
CeCe: [laughing] Oh, no.
Paul: And Iām up there for about, like, I donāt know, four or five minutes. And, you know, the lights are on me. Thereās 300 people in front of me, and thereās a girl whoās just looking at me, and ā
Amanda and CeCe: [laughing]
Amanda: Looking at you? Or looking at your pants?
Paul: Well sheās looking at me. And then sheās looking down and sheās looking at me and looking down. Iām like, well ā
Amanda and CeCe: [laughing]
Amanda: Well⦠[laughing]
Paul: And then sheās kind of, she kind of makes this zipper thing, and Iām like, I donāt understand and Iām focused. Iām talking to the audience and sheās kind of like, insisting? You know what I mean?
Amanda and CeCe: [laughing]
Paul: As nice as she can be. And then I realize whatās going on. And I, you know, as I do, I tried to make light of it, in front of everybody.
[laughing]
Paul: But the problem with that is, is that now every time when Iām on stage about ten minutes in and I have this innate thing that my zippers down.
Amanda: Thatās fantastic.
Paul: And so I have to figure out how to check without everybody seeing.
[laughing]
Amanda: Like looking downā¦
Paul: Just likeā¦
CeCe: You just tell the story, be like āIām sorry, but I have to check now.ā [laughing]
Paul: āIām sorry everybody, Iām about to do something wholly inappropriate in front of the entire room.ā So I just thought Iād share that.
Amanda: Thatās amazing. I love that for you.
Paul: Yeah.
CeCe: Itās almost fitting for the conversation.
Amanda: Oh god.
Paul: Is it? Whatās our topic?
[laughing]
Amanda: What the hell just happenedā¦
Paul: OK, Iām joined now by CeCe and Amanda and Lukeās over here running sound and producing the show for us. And what is our topic going to be for this podcast? For What The Hell Just Happened in H.R.?
CeCe: Well, Iām bringing you another EEOC settlement today.
Amanda: Love the EEOC.
Paul: So weāre going to go current events on this one.
Amanda: Yeah. Yeah.
Voice Over: Youāre about to listen to another episode of What The Hell Just Happened?! Join Paul Edwards and his guests as they discuss and sometimes even solve some interesting HR problems.
Paul: And⦠Iām gonna go off the rails sometimes and talk about whatever I want.
Paul: So we have a case for the EEOC, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, who are charged with enforcing a set of federal laws. Thereās often a state version of the EEOC.
CeCe: Yeah.
Paul: And they may have their own set of rules that kind of mirror the federal rules and yadda, yadda, yadda H.R., H.R., H.R.
Amanda: Theyāre spooky.
CeCe: [laughing]
Paul: They are spooky. They investigate, and then they issue right to sue letters. They can, they do and/or they may choose to do the enforcement themselves and they come after you on their own without the person whoās filed a complaint having to hire an attorney and be represented. Okay?
CeCe: Right.
Paul: So everybody knows what the EEOC is now and that it pretty much is, you know, something we have to worry about. What happened in H.R.?
CeCe: So this case has to do with Monroe Auto. Iām not familiar with them. I think they operate with some smaller businesses that probably have more common, household names.
Paul: What do they do?
CeCe: They settled a case forā¦to me, this is kind of a surprisingly low amount, but $200,000.
Paul: Okay.
CeCe: When you hear the issue, I think youāll understand why I say that seems a little bit low.
Paul: Right.
CeCe: So they had some sexual harassment issues ā
Paul: Okay.
CeCe: Happening. Amanda, what you think of when you hear sexual harassment?
Amanda: An intimidating boss saying, āDo things for me or I wonāt promote you.ā
CeCe: Okay, so quid pro quo.
Paul: Quid pro quo.
CeCe: Sexual harassment. Thatās what Amanda thinks of.
Paul: Iām glad she didnāt say, ātelling stories about his zipperā¦ā
CeCe: [laughing]
Paul: āā¦On his podcast.ā
Amanda: Telling stories about his zippers on stage. [laughing]
CeCe: Yeah.
Amanda: Yeah. That or like, you know, creepy people like that wonāt leave you alone if theyāre hitting on you and you turn them down, they, like, turn into a jerk. I guess that also is quid pro quo?
CeCe: No, no, quid pro quo is when somebody with authority asks you for sexual things in return ā
Amanda: Oh! Okay.
CeCe: For a raise, a promotion, something.
Amanda: That makes sense.
Paul: Or implies without you doing that, you will not be able to advance.
Amanda: Okay.
CeCe: Right.
Amanda: Then the other thing I said is just being a jerk. [laughing]
CeCe: Yeah, well, no, I mean, itās still sexual harassment.
Amanda: Well yeah.
CeCe: Totally. Inappropriate touching.
Amanda: Yeah.
CeCe: Inappropriate ā
Paul: Comments.
CeCe: Comments. Yeah.
Paul: Unprofessional communication.
Amanda: Thatās what I think of.
CeCe: Yeah, thatās the most common. And they did have some of this⦠male employees being groped in their groin area.
Amanda: Oh! Male employees?
CeCe: That was part of this. Unusual, right?
Amanda: Yeah, that is unusual.
CeCe: Right? From what we think of the typical sexual harassment issues are. What to me made this interesting, is that a large part of this issue was a female employee repeatedly being addressed as things like āwomanā or something other than her name that were entirely focused on her gender.
Paul: Right.
CeCe: And in addition to that, she was required to do like personal assistant type duties for her supervisor.
Paul: Uh huh.
CeCe: And she was hired as a worker on the vehicles just like all of the men were.
Paul: Oh wow!
CeCe: So she was not hired as a personal assistant, which would be fine-
Paul: Yeah.
CeCe: To make her do those duties. But she was asked to do these duties just because she was the woman on site there.
Amanda: Ew! Gross. Thatās horrible.
Paul: Let me guess. No, no other worker, male ā
CeCe: Correct.
Paul: Was ever asked to do any of the personal errands ā
Amanda: Oh of course. [scoffs]
Paul: For any of the other supervisors in any of the locations?
CeCe: Correct. Yeah.
Paul: Yeah. So weāve got a⦠wow!
Amanda: Oh my God, have you seen Legally Blonde?
Paul: I think?
CeCe: [laughing] Not in a lot of years.
Paul: Itās been a long time.
Amanda: Legally Blonde: Red, White and Blonde, the sequel ā
Paul: Uh huh.
Amanda: Does have⦠Or is it the first one? I donāt remember. Itās one of the Legally Blondes, where Itās like one of the female lawyers gets asked to join the big time male lawyers group or whatever as like an intern and he just, like, makes her go get coffee all the time.
Paul: Yeah.
CeCe: Oh, yeah.
Amanda: Sheās like, yeah, I just had to get his coffee, his dry cleaning, you know, working my way up. But all the male lawyers are like at the table. All the other male interns are at the table, like, working on the case. And sheās like, getting coffee.
Paul: Yeah, that is, yeah. Not appropriate.
CeCe: And I donāt think itās something that people think of as sexual harassment typically.
Paul: Right.
CeCe: I think? Yeah, most people would be like, āThat sucksā, right?
Amanda: Yeah.
CeCe: Or they donāt like it, but I donāt think a lot of peopleās minds go to that being sexual harassment and something that the EEOC might say ā
Paul: Right.
CeCe: This is a big problem.
Paul: Yeah, definitely gender based, a direct impact. I mean, itās, youāve been hired to be a mechanic and next thing you know, youāre being asked to run personal errands. So the EEOC investigated?
CeCe: They investigated, they agreed with the complaints that the employees had submitted andā¦
Paul: So Iām curious. So I get the thing, but who is grabbing who in theā¦?
Amanda: Yeah I was gonna say ādidnāt you say male gropingā?
CeCe: Yeah. They were not explaining⦠I would presume it was supervisors. It sounds like a very male dominated environment. It was not the woman because the woman was one of the plaintiffs as well.
Paul: Uh huh.
CeCe: So I would presume it was supervisors. They didnāt name people.
Amanda: Yeah.
CeCe: Thereās not you knowā¦
Paul: So we donāt know who was grabbing who or how?
Amanda: Like which gender�
CeCe: No, I mean, they could have been grabbing each other. I donāt know.
Amanda: Okay.
CeCe: They just said male employees⦠referenced male employees.
Paul: Wow!
Amanda: Interesting.
Paul: Okay, so Iām going to bring up a male thing.
CeCe: [laughing]
Amanda: Oh, gosh, here we go.
Paul: Yeah. Yeah, here we go.
CeCe: Sports locker room stuff?
Paul: Yeah, yeah.
Amanda: [laughing] What is this going to be?
Paul: Yeah, yeah. Well, or yeah, itās got some⦠at some point immature, a group of immature males can show up in a circumstance where theyāre hitting each other. Itās a joke.
CeCe: Yeah.
Paul: Itās like a funny thing where you just kind of whack the other guy-
CeCe: [sarcasm] Hilarious.
Paul: Itās allā¦
CeCe: [laughing]
Paul: Well, I mean, Luke immediatelyā¦
CeCe: [laughing] Iām just saying I donāt get it. I donāt.
Paul: Luke just made a motion, and he actually did it properly. So. So, my point that Iām trying to make here is that we call it nut whacking.
Amanda: Iām sorry, what?!
CeCe: Oh, wow! [laughing]
Paul: Yeah. Tapping? Oh, Luke was like, āNo, itās called tappingā. Okay, so both of you were ā
CeCe: So it that a generational gap there?
[laughing]
Paul: Yeah, but still, we both passed it down.
CeCe: Yeah. Yeah.
Paul: Luke is what, 23? 21!
CeCe: [laughing]
Paul: And so even Luke knows about it. So weāre 40 years apart.
CeCe: Yeah.
Paul: And so itās kind of a joke, a locker room thing, but Luke did it in the proper way. You do it with the back of your hand. If you do it with the front of your handā¦
CeCe: [laughing]
Paul: Itās a completely differentā¦Itās a completely different gesture.
CeCe: So Iām gonna guess ā
Amanda: So Iām sorryā¦
CeCe: That the EEOC does notā¦
[laughing]
Paul: Did not care!
[laughing]
Paul: Thatās where I was going! I donāt thinkā¦
CeCe: [laughing] Noā¦
Paul: You know, when they did that, was it the back of the hand or the front of the hand?
Amanda: Okay, so wait, hold on. Iām still hung up on the fact thatā¦
Paul: You said hung up.
Amanda: What do boys learn in school? Do you ever wonder that? Like do they say, āokay, so remember when you go to your jobs, youāre allowed to hit, hit dudesā?
Paul: Yeah.
CeCe: [laughing]
Paul: Itās fun.
Amanda: āItās for locker room thingā, like, is that what boys learn in school?
Paul: Yes, it is.
Amanda: I donāt understand. [laughing]
Paul: Itās a little bit, itās a little bit what we learned in school. Yeah.
Amanda: [laughing] What? Iāve never heard that before.
CeCe: I donāt know. I donāt have a boy.
Paul: It happens in a locker room. I donāt know who teaches it to you when, but you pretty much learn whether or not, if youāre in that kind of climate. I mean, if you go on to TikTok or any of that-
Amanda: Oh Iām sure now itās going to come up all over my feed because my phoneās right here so thanks for that. [laughing]
Paul: Yeah. So it can hear it and youāre going to start getting videos. I mean, itās a thing and ā
Amanda: Is it like one of those understood things where you told me when you have a motorcycle and you pass another motorcycle, you do like the ā
Paul: Oh yeah, you do your āhand outā.
Amanda: The little hand dance.
Paul: And then it makes me really angry if the other thing is a scooter as it goes byā¦
[laughing]
Paul: Like itās not a motorcycle itās a scooter and then Iām like cussing to God because I just gave him the motorcycle hand wave, and thatās not cool.
CeCe: [laughing] Yeah.
Paul: And I used to, and Iāll tell you how the worldās evolved, used to if it was a woman on the motorcycle and I do the hand thing and sheād do the hand thing, and sheād go by and āWhoa, that was a chick on a motorcycle.ā
CeCe: [laughing] I just watched an episode of⦠is it 911? I donāt know.
Amanda: Reno 911?
CeCe: No, no, no. Texasā¦I donāt know.
Amanda: Texas Chainsaw Massacre?
CeCe: No, absolutely not. [laughing] Itās one of those, like ā
[laughing]
Paul: Donāt mess with Texas?
CeCe: First responder, firefighter shows ā
Paul: Oh! Uh huh.
CeCe: Thatās popular right now. Itās the Texas version.
Paul: Like Texas 911! Probably.
CeCe: Yeah. So yeah, but he, one of the main characters, gets a motorcycle and thereās like a whole thing about he joins a motorcycle gang and they give him, like, bells to put on the back of a motorcycle.
Paul: Uh huh.
CeCe: To scare away, like, the demons on the road or something. [laughing]
Amanda: Oh my god, thatās hilarious.
Paul: So but now two years later and Iām in Tucson and thereās motorcyclists everywhere.
CeCe: Yeah.
Paul: I donāt know, I donāt care what your gender is [laughing] but Iām just saying, there was a time when it was unusual to see a woman on the, you know right, driving the motorcycle and I would notice and now there isnāt. I donāt know why I told that storyā¦
[laughing]
Paul: But I want to go back to what I was joking about, which is the whole guys whacking each other.
Amanda: I canāt⦠you canāt say it like that, Paul.
CeCe: [laughing]
Paul: I..I donāt..
Amanda: [exasperated] You canāt! Thatās notā¦
[laughing]
Paul: Tappingā¦tapping doesnāt work either.
Amanda: You canāt say āguys whacking each otherā.
[laughing]
Amanda: Thatās just notā¦you canāt say thatā¦
[laughing]
Paul: I live in the real world. Everybody is in here sweatingā¦
CeCe: I hope the EEOCās not listening to this episode. [laughing]
Paul: CeCe, head of H.R., is like, sheās like āIām gettingā¦yeahā
Amanda: Iām trying to teach you.
CeCe: I will schedule a meeting for the three of us after this.
[laughing]
Paul: Yeah. Yeah. So Iām going to bring this back around full circle: What you may deem as something thatās kind of joking around and harmless, the EEOC will not agree with.
CeCe: Right.
Paul: So, you knowā¦
Amanda: Yeah, theyāre spooky.
Paul: Well, theyāreā¦
Amanda and CeCe: [laughing]
Paul: Theyāre not going to put up with shenanigans.
Amanda: Of course and they shouldnāt!
Paul: And itās not okay for male or female or anybody to be touching each other inappropriately in any way, shape or form. And so thereās a difference between the locker room, and you and your buddies, or you and your friends, and work.
CeCe: Yeah.
Paul: And thereās a line thatās drawn. And I think itās easy, especially in smaller businesses to blur that line and kind of be making the jokes and the double entendres and the things get going around. And the next thing you know, as they say someone gets an eye put out and youāve got an EEOC complaint.
Amanda: Well, yeah. And itās not okay to hire someone and then have them do a completely different job just because of your perceived notions on their gender.
Paul: Yeah, yeah.
Amanda: āOh, no, we hired you for this, but since you be a womanā¦ā
Paul: Yeah.
Amanda: āGo get me my coffee.ā
Paul: And Iām, you know, because we donāt have all the detailsā¦
Amanda: Right.
Paul: But I would guess that thereās some component in there where she had to say when asked, āWhy didnāt you say something?ā She said, āI felt like I would lose my job if I did.ā
CeCe: Sure.
Amanda: Oh I guarantee it.
Paul: Itās almost always tied back and it doesnāt matter if thatās true or not.
Paul: Itās what the perception of the employee is. Right, CeCe?
CeCe: Exactly. Yeah.
Paul: Thatās the first thing that ā
Amanda: Wait, what do you mean by that? So like, you know, because I assist as someone thatās not educated in all this stuff ā [laughing]
Paul: Uh huh.
Amanda: Iām not an adviser here or anything. You say, āItās what the employee perceives.ā So like, I mean, obviously there has to be like, evidence? Or justā¦?
Paul: Based off the facts, would a reasonable person be able to draw the conclusion that they might lose their job if they were to say something to the person who they feel is harassing them, whoās the only person who can stop.
Amanda: Hmm.
Paul: So the only person who could stop misusing her and keep her in a role is her manager.
Cece: Right.
Amanda: I see.
Paul: And itās the manager whoās breaking the rules. So she has a reasonable belief that if she goes to the manager and confronts the manager, says āwhat are you doing? Youāre not making any other guys go get your laundry. You donāt do any of thisā, that the manager could then fire her, at will, without giving her any reason and so the court looks at that.
Amanda: Oh, okay.
Paul: Thatās a very, very important thing. What is the perception of the employee? Itās the same thing about no-gossiping policies and why you canāt have that kind of thing, is that is it broad enough that an employee could reasonably believe that they cannot discuss their benefits, wages and working conditions? Because it could be, it could fall underneath the word āgossipā.
Amanda: Interesting.
Paul: And just as it makes that policy illegal because itās so broad on the other side.
Amanda: Yeah.
CeCe: Right. And similarly, they may, this may have been going on, it may be exactly what youāre saying they were with the groping part. They, āit was in funā for maybe many, many years.
Paul: Yeah.
CeCe: One person was hired who did not find that fun.
Paul: Did not think it was funny.
CeCe: And it doesnāt, it doesnāt matter that everybody else is fine with it at that point. I mean, it didnāt necessarily matter before, but now that person is offended. Itās reasonable that theyāre offended ā
Amanda: Yeah.
CeCe: And they can complain to the EEOC and you know, the standard isnāt that these other people were fine with it, so that one person is wrong.
Paul: Thatās exactly right. Yeah. Yeah, thatās exactly correct.
Amanda: Thatās interesting. I donāt know why this makes me think of this, but when you were talking, when you talk a lot about hiring and how you need to make sure someone fits your culture, but it isnāt, youāre not hiring someone that you ālikeā. Like itās someone that actually fits the job.
Paul: Uh huh.
Amanda: Thatās kind of that same thing. Like youāre not really looking for someone thatās going to be okay with you hitting them. [laughing]
Paul: Or touching you inappropriately, or miss, or miss ā
Amanda: Because thatās like āthe usualā at your office.
Paul: Yeah.
Amanda: Thatās notā¦
CeCe: Thatās often what those types of environments look for ā
Amanda: Yeah.
CeCe: Is trying to parse out, āIs this person going to be okay with that?ā Because we donāt want to change that type of behavior.
Paul: Oh, good point.
CeCe: Thatās obviously not what we would recommend. [laughing]
Amanda: I was gonna say, āthatās not the best thing to doā. [laughing]
CeCe: Donāt make your skills test, like⦠whatever the term was. [laughing]
Paul: Wellā¦.
Amanda: Donāt use that term on this podcast anymore. [laughing]
CeCe: Yeah. [laughing]
Paul: Itās killing me. I need to say it again.
Amanda and CeCe: [laughing]
Paul: Iāve already said it. So what happens when you hire from within CeCe? That perpetuates this kind of thing, right?
CeCe: Correct
Paul: So youāre always hiring the buddy of the guy or the friends of the friends and you can end up kind of perpetuating something like this because itās just⦠itās part of the culture.
Amanda: Gross. Not a culture I want to be a part of.
Paul: Well, itās hard.
Amanda: EEOC! Get āem!
[laughter]
Paul: I, I feel for the ā
Amanda: Oh yeah.
Paul: I feel for the business in some ways because oftentimes itās this kind of rogue office or this rogue location, and itās not part of the culture of the business. And they just didnāt know it was going on. That can happen. It really can. Thatās the double edged sword to creating multiple locations for your practice.
CeCe: Uh huh.
Paul: If youāre listening, you canāt know once you go to two locations, it completely changes the dynamic of what you know and what you can have control over. So it becomes super important that managers have training and that you, you know, that you donāt let this type of thing get out of control.
Amanda: Yeah.
CeCe: It sure is a theme for, I think every podcast that Iāve been on so far is the ā
Amanda: It really is! [laughing]
CeCe: Yeah, but that training piece is so importantā¦
Paul: Yeah.
CeCe: And filtering the knowledge down, filtering all of that to the individual places where there are leaders making decisions every single day.
Paul: Yeah. And the bigger you get, the more employees you have, the more paths you need to be able to provide to them so that if the person whoās harassing them is their, it canāt be their only path back to you to let you know that thereās a problem.
CeCe: Right.
Paul: And I think, you know, again, weāre just guessing because we donāt have all the details, that that employee probably didnāt feel she had another way to get around that supervisor to say āThis is what heās requiring of me. Or sheās requiring of me.ā
CeCe: Yeah, I think thatās a reasonable assumption.
Amanda: Well Iām glad they have to pay. Iām glad the EEOC got āem. [laughing]
Paul: Yeah. Yeah. Thatās not any way to treat somebody.
Amanda: Thatās unfortunate. Yeah. Yeah, exactly.
CeCe: I donāt know. I never feel that like sense of joy from these things ā
Paul: I donāt.
CeCe: Because I feel like people are still suffering.
Amanda: Oh no! Now that makes me sound like a jerk! [laughing]
CeCe: No, no, no. Not at all. I just, I always have concern that itās, you know, a fine is a fine is a fine. But is it really fundamentally changing anything?
Amanda: Thatās true.
CeCe: Because the EEOC is not going in and doing training or you know?
Paul: Right.
CeCe: So is it really changing?
Amanda: Is anything gonna change?
CeCe: Anything at that level?
Amanda: Or are they just gonna be likeā¦yeah.
CeCe: Or are they even more mad now?
Amanda: Or are they now gonna be like, āWeāre only going to hire men going forward.ā [laughing]
CeCe: [laughing] Yeah. Yeah.
Paul: Well noā¦There can always be unintended consequences.
CeCe: There can. Yeah.
Amanda: Uh huh.
CeCe: Or maybe now thereās more intimidation, like, you know, there might be comments made, āOh, are you one of those people who is going to go report to HR?ā
Paul: Yeah.
CeCe: You know soā¦
Amanda: Hate that. Donāt be that guy.
CeCe: [laughing]
Paul: I think theā¦
Amanda: Donāt be a jerk.
Paul: No, donāt monkey⦠Monkeying around at work leads to this. Iām just using that as a generalization.
Amanda: Yeah.
CeCe: Yeah.
Paul: You know, to keep it professional, youāve got to keep it work related while still⦠you got to be able to joke around and have some fun.
Amanda: Of course!
Paul: And not have people freak out about it. So itās a, I donāt know if itās such a fine line, but it is one more thing as a leader and as a manager that youāre faced with getting right, and especially when youāre a manager of managers.
CeCe: Yeah.
Paul: This is a next level step that you kind of have to take to be able to train people to do the right thing.
CeCe: Yeah, getting the boundaries right can be complicated.
Paul: Yeah. Yeah, it can be.
Voice Over: Thanks for joining us for this weekās episode of What The Hell Just Happened? do Paul a favor; share this with your network. If you have an HR issue or a question, and youād like us to discuss it on this show, send it to podcast@WTHjusthappened.com. For more HR advice and insights from Paul and his team of experts, you can also join the private Facebook group, HR Base Camp, or visit HRbasecamp.com. Make sure you tune in next week. And remember: better workplaces make better lives.
Friendly Disclaimer: This information is general in nature and is not intended to provide legal advice or replace individual guidance about a specific issue with an attorney or HR expert. The information on this page is general human resources guidance based on applicable local, state, and/or federal U.S. employment law that is believed to be current as of the date of publication. Note that CEDR is not a law firm, and as the law is always changing, you should consult with a qualified attorney or HR expert who is familiar with all of the facts of your situation before making a decision about any human resources or employment law matter.
A Blog Written by CEDR, written by HR Experts to help you run your practice.
Did overtime become tax-free? No. The law created a federal income tax deduction for the premium portion of qualifying overtime...
THE ARTICLE AT A GLANCE Key takeaways Overtime calculations depend on the workweek, actual hours, and all compensation included in...
Employers have always needed to be vigilant about complying with immigration laws, most especially with federal I-9 forms and E-Verify...
You can generally require that an employee use their paid vacation time toward any time off they take.